United States v. McKeon
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
738 F.2d 26 (1984)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted Bernard McKeon (defendant) for illegally exporting firearms. The government's case rested on incriminating photocopies allegedly made by McKeon's wife. McKeon's first two trials ended in mistrial. The same attorney represented McKeon at both the second and third trials. The attorney's opening statement at the second trial asserted McKeon’s wife could not have made the photocopies. The attorney's opening statement at the third trial said McKeon’s wife innocently made the photocopies for another person who was the real gun exporter. The government introduced the earlier statement to show its inconsistency with the later statement, which the government argued implied McKeon’s consciousness of his guilt. The jury convicted McKeon. and he appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, arguing the judge should have excluded the attorney's previous opening statement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Winter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.