United States v. Metropolitan District Commission

23 ERC (BNA) 1350 (1985)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Metropolitan District Commission

United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
23 ERC (BNA) 1350 (1985)

Facts

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a permit under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Metropolitan District Commission (MDC) (defendant) limiting the amount of pollution the MDC could discharge from two islands in the Boston Harbor. The EPA found that the MDC had violated the permit by failing to construct treatment and sludge-management facilities as required and issued an administrative order that included a schedule under which the MDC was required to be compliant. Later, the EPA issued another order stating that the MDC had violated the permit by exceeding its sludge and pollution limits and by failing to come into compliance with the previously issued schedule. In another administrative order, the EPA created an interim schedule for the MDC while it began planning for the required construction, but the EPA specifically stated that compliance with this schedule did not excuse the MDC’s violations of the permit. Notably, while the permit had an expiration date, under the law, the permit was enforceable until modified or replaced with the issuance of a new permit. NPDES set out very specific procedures that must take place before a permit could be modified or replaced. None of the procedures for the modification or replacement of an NPDES permit were followed. The United States (plaintiff), on behalf of the EPA, filed suit against the MDC for violations of the permit and moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mazzone, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership