Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

United States v. Mezzanatto

United States Supreme Court
513 U.S. 196 (1995)


Facts

Mezzanatto (defendant) was arrested on drug charges after selling methamphetamine to an undercover cop. Mezzanatto and his attorney met with the prosecutor to discuss cooperating with the authorities. The prosecutor told Mezzanatto that he had to agree that any statements he made during the discussion could be used to impeach any inconsistent statements he might make at trial. Mezzanatto talked with his attorney and then agreed to this condition. During discussions, Mezzanatto admitted knowing that the package he sold to the undercover cop had drugs in it. He also admitted knowing about a meth lab at the home of a man named Shuster. Later, at trial, Mezzanatto denied knowing that the package contained drugs and denied knowing about Shuster’s meth lab. On cross examination, over the objection of Mezzanatto’s attorney, the prosecutor asked Mezzanatto about the prior inconsistent statements he made at their earlier meeting. Mezzanatto was found guilty. The appellate court reversed his conviction and held that Mezzanatto’s agreement to allow statements made during plea bargaining to be used for impeachment at trial was unenforceable. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(6) and Federal Rule of Evidence 410 (the plea bargaining rules) exclude statements made during plea bargaining from being used as evidence at trial. The appellate court held that these rules’ exclusionary provisions cannot be waived. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence (Ginsburg, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Souter, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.