United States v. Michigan Department of Community Health

2011 WL 2412602 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Michigan Department of Community Health

United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan
2011 WL 2412602 (2011)

  • Written by Patrick Speice, JD

Facts

The federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) (plaintiff) issued an administrative subpoena to the Michigan Department of Community Health (MDCH) (defendant) as part of an investigation into potential violations of the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The DEA’s subpoena, issued pursuant to the CSA, sought copies of medical-marijuana authorization applications and the resultant medical-marijuana authorization cards for seven individuals authorized as medical-marijuana users or primary caregivers under Michigan’s medical-marijuana law. The MDCH refused to comply with the subpoena, citing a provision in Michigan’s medical-marijuana law prohibiting disclosure of certain confidential information contained in the subpoenaed documents. The DEA filed a lawsuit in federal district court seeking a judicial order enforcing the subpoena and requiring the MDCH to produce the subpoenaed documents.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brenneman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership