United States v. Microsoft Corp.

147 F.3d 935 (1998)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
U
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Microsoft Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
147 F.3d 935 (1998)

Facts

Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) (defendant) was a leading provider of computer software and related products. After Microsoft established a commanding market share in the market for operating systems, a consent decree was issued in 1995, preventing Microsoft from conditioning the sale of its software on the additional purchase of a separate software product. However, the consent decree allowed Microsoft to sell integrated products, or products with different functionalities that had been combined into a single package. After Microsoft began integrating a web browser called Internet Explorer into its Windows 95 operating system, the United States (plaintiff) brought a complaint against Microsoft, alleging a violation of the consent decree. Specifically, the government argued that Microsoft was employing a tying arrangement that forced purchasers of Windows 95 to use Internet Explorer, thereby providing Microsoft with an unfair advantage in the market for web browsers. The district court issued a preliminary injunction against Microsoft. Microsoft appealed the injunction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 788,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Antitrust

Key Terms