United States v. Montas
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
41 F.3d 775 (1994)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Hector Julio Felix Montas (defendant) was charged with possession with intent to distribute cocaine. A customs K-9 unit had detected cocaine in his luggage at the airport, although the luggage had a different name on the tags. At trial, the prosecution called DEA agent Ivan Rios as a witness. Rios gave his opinion and experiences with similar drug cases involving airport luggage. Specifically, Rios testified that individuals smuggling drugs generally do not use their real names on their plane tickets and luggage. Montas objected at various times throughout Rios’s testimony on the grounds of speculation, relevance, and leading questions. The objections were overruled. The jury convicted Montas. He appealed on the grounds that the court improperly admitted Rios’s expert testimony because the testimony “concerned a subject within an average juror’s understanding.”
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Coffin, S.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
