United States v. Montoya de Hernandez

473 U.S. 531 (1985)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Montoya de Hernandez

United States Supreme Court
473 U.S. 531 (1985)

Play video

Facts

Rosa Elvira Montoya de Hernandez (Hernandez) (defendant) flew into Los Angeles on a direct flight from Bogotá, Colombia, a location considered a narcotics source. Because Hernandez had made eight recent trips to Miami or Los Angeles, customs officials flagged her for additional questioning. Hernandez claimed that she came to Los Angeles to purchase items to sell in her husband’s Bogotá store. She had $5,000 in cash but no hotel reservation, local friends or family, scheduled appointments, checks, or credit cards. Officials therefore suspected that Hernandez had swallowed drugs in balloons to smuggle them into the United States. A pat-down and strip search revealed that Hernandez was wearing two pairs of underwear and that her stomach was firm, reinforcing the suspicion that Hernandez was smuggling drugs in her alimentary canal. When officials were unable to get Hernandez on a prompt return flight to Colombia, Hernandez was held for observation, being told that she would remain in observation until she either had a monitored bowel movement or consented to an X-ray. Hernandez remained in detention for over 16 hours, refusing the X-ray and refraining from using the bathroom despite obvious discomfort. The officials then obtained a court order authorizing an X-ray and rectal exam, which revealed many balloons containing cocaine. Hernandez was convicted for federal drug offenses. The court of appeals reversed the conviction upon finding that the evidence available to officials before the detention did not provide a clear indication Hernandez was an alimentary-canal smuggler. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)

Concurrence (Stevens, J.)

Dissent (Brennan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 790,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership