United States v. Moon Lake Electric Association, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Colorado
45 F. Supp. 2d 1070 (1999)
- Written by Erin Enser, JD
Facts
Moon Lake Electric Association, Inc. (Moon Lake) (defendant) was a power company that supplied electricity to an oil field in an area where several species of birds, including bald eagles and golden eagles, made their homes. Because there were few trees, the birds often perched on the poles and power lines. Moon Lake did not install any of the available and affordable plastic insulators or perch guards that would have prevented perching birds from being electrocuted. As a result, several birds were killed or injured, and the United States filed an information charging Moon Lake with multiple violations of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA, together with the MBTA, the acts), both of which generally prohibited any person, at any time or in any manner, from taking any bald eagle or golden eagle. The acts similarly defined to take to include killing, wounding, poisoning, molesting, or disturbing bald or golden eagles. The legislative record for the BGEPA, which was modeled on the MBTA, referenced the activities of power companies and advised power companies to take necessary precautions to avoid running afoul of the restrictions. Moon Lake filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the acts did not apply to unintentional conduct not normally exhibited by hunters and poachers.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Babcock, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.