United States v. Muhtorov
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
20 F.4th 558 (2021)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
While Jamshid Muhtorov (defendant) was living in the United States as a lawful permanent resident, he developed ties with the Islamic Jihad Union (IJU), a foreign terrorist organization. During warrantless surveillance of the emails of a non-United States person living abroad under § 702 the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendment Act of 2008, the government (plaintiff) incidentally collected Muhtorov’s communications with the target. The emails revealed Muhtorov’s connection to IJU. The government used the incidentally collected communications to obtain approval to surveil Muhtorov under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA). The government then collected numerous emails and audio recordings showing Muhtorov’s support of IJU. A Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) informant learned that Muhtorov planned to travel to Turkey and join the organization. FBI agents arrested Muhtorov at the airport, and he was charged with conspiring and providing material support to IJU. Muhtorov moved to suppress the evidence acquired during the FISA surveillance on the basis that the surveillance approval was based on the allegedly unconstitutional warrantless collection of his communications during the § 207 surveillance of a foreign target. The government argued that the incidental collection of Muhtorov’s communications did not violate Muhtorov’s Fourth Amendment rights. The district court ruled in the government’s favor, and Muhtorov was ultimately convicted. Muhtorov appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Matheson, J.)
Dissent (Lucero, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.