United States v. Myers
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
550 F.2d 1036 (1977)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
A lone gunman robbed a Florida bank. Law enforcement suspected the gunman was Larry Myers (defendant) but struggled to apprehend him. Approximately three weeks after the Florida robbery, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents followed Myers’s girlfriend to a shopping mall, where she met with Myers. A plainclothes agent spotted Myers, but Myers left quickly before he could be arrested. Three weeks later, Myers and Dennis Coffie robbed a Pennsylvania bank. After that robbery, Myers and Coffie were riding a motorcycle in California when an FBI agent drove at them in an unmarked vehicle, causing them to stop. There was conflicting testimony about whether Myers and Coffie attempted to flee the scene before FBI agents identified themselves and arrested the men. Myers was convicted under state law for committing the Pennsylvania robbery. Myers was then charged under federal law for the Florida robbery. The initial federal trial ended in a hung jury. At a second federal trial, the district court instructed the jury that a defendant’s intentional flight from law enforcement could be considered as a factor tending to show a guilty conscience. The jury convicted Myers on the federal robbery charges. Myers appealed to the Fifth Circuit, arguing, among other things, that the district court had erred in issuing the flight instruction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 798,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.