United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
419 F.2d 1237 (1969)
The United States (plaintiff) charged Roy Arthur Nelson (defendant) as a principal in a bank robbery. His co-defendant, Frank Brewton, was found incompetent to stand trial. The evidence showed Brewton entered the bank while a second man waited in the getaway car. Police chased the car and it crashed after Nelson was observed jumping out of the driver's seat. Police apprehended Nelson and Brewton and found cash in their pockets. Brewton's cash carried bank markings but Nelson's cash did not. The jury convicted Nelson as a principal, and Nelson appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Nelson contended the government's circumstantial evidence did not prove he drove the getaway car or he knew the bank was being robbed, and therefore left open the possibility that his involvement in the car crash could be innocently explained.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Browning, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 223,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.