United States v. New
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
55 M.J. 95 (2001)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Army Specialist Michael New (defendant) was a medic whose Army company was participating in a United Nations mission to provide protective forces to the former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia. As part of his participation in the mission, New was ordered to modify his Army uniform to wear certain United Nations symbols. These symbols included a United Nations blue beret and field cap, a blue United Nations shoulder patch, a blue scarf, a United Nations badge, and an identification card issued by the former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia. New refused to obey the order to wear the uniform modifications, arguing that (1) wearing the modifications would transfer his allegiance to the United Nations against his wishes and (2) the order was illegal because the United States military’s participation in the United Nations mission was illegal. A special court-martial convicted New of disobedience for failing to follow the order to modify his uniform. The matter was reviewed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Crawford, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.