United States v. Newman
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
773 F.3d 438 (2014)
Financial analysts at various firms obtained non-public information from corporate insiders. The analysts knew the insiders as family friends, casual acquaintances, or fellow business school alumni. With one exception involving the mutual sharing of career advice, the insiders received nothing in exchange for their disclosures to the analysts. Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson (defendants) were fund managers several levels removed from the disclosing corporate insiders. They received and traded on the inside information. The U.S. government (plaintiff) charged Newman and Chiasson with securities fraud. The district court instructed the jury that, in order for it to reach a guilty verdict, the defendants had to have known that the corporate insiders disclosed material, non-public information. Newman and Chiasson were convicted. They appealed, arguing that the jury instructions were improper and that the government had failed to prove that they knew that the corporate insiders had obtained a personal benefit in exchange for their disclosure.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.