United States v. North
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
910 F.2d 843, 920 F.2d 940 (1990)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Oliver North (defendant) provided compelled testimony to Congress. As compelled testimony, North’s testimony was immunized under 18 U.S.C. § 6002. Eventually, the government (plaintiff) brought criminal charges against North related to his congressional testimony. The district court did not hold a full hearing to assess whether North’s immunized testimony was improperly used by the prosecution to affect the testimony of witnesses during his criminal trial. North appealed to United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The circuit court remanded the case to hold a Kastigar hearing to determine whether the prosecution used information from North’s immunized testimony before Congress. The government filed a petition for rehearing, which the circuit court granted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Dissent (Wald, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.