United States v. Odeh
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
815 F.3d 968 (2016)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Rasmieh Odeh (defendant) was a resident of Jordan who had previously lived in Lebanon and Israel. In 1969–1970, Odeh was arrested and convicted in Israel of crimes related to the terrorist bombing of a supermarket and the attempted bombing of a British consulate. Odeh was sentenced to two life terms in prison and was incarcerated until she was released in a prisoner-exchange program in 1979. In 1994, Odeh submitted an immigrant-visa application to the United States. In her application, Odeh answered “no” to questions asking whether she had ever been arrested or convicted of a crime. Her visa was granted, and after living in the United States for approximately 10 years, Odeh applied to become a naturalized citizen in 2004. Odeh again lied about her criminal history in the naturalization-application process, and in person to a government official during an interview. Her naturalization was approved. In 2013, the United States government (plaintiff) discovered evidence of her convictions in Israel and prosecuted her for illegally obtaining citizenship under 18 U.S.C. § 1425(a). At trial, Odeh sought to present expert testimony that she suffered from post-traumatic-stress disorder (PTSD) as a result of torture she suffered at the hands of the Israeli military, and that because of this condition she had not known that her statements were false. The district court did not allow Odeh to present this evidence. Odeh was convicted and sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment. Odeh appealed, alleging that she was denied the right to present a complete defense.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.