United States v. Ohio Edison Co.

276 F. Supp. 2d 829 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Ohio Edison Co.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
276 F. Supp. 2d 829 (2003)

Facts

Congress passed the Clean Air Act (CAA) in 1970, which requires plants built after 1970 to comply with stringent air quality standards. Plants built before 1970 are exempt from these standards unless there is a modification at the plant. The Environmental Protection Agency, through regulation, defined modification to include activities that involve both a physical change to the plant and a resulting increase in emissions. The EPA specifically excluded routine maintenance, repair, or replacement from the definition of modification. The EPA and the states of Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York (plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit against Ohio Edison Co. (defendant), asserting that certain projects that were completed on seven electric generating units at Ohio Edison’s Sammis Plant were modifications, thus requiring Ohio Edison to bring the units into compliance with the air quality standards set by the CAA.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sargus, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership