United States v. Olson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
856 F.3d 1216 (2017)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Kyle Beus applied for and received a federal grant to open a facility to manufacture ice cream and cheese. Karen Olson (defendant) helped set up a milk-processing facility using a similar federal grant. Both grant applications contained warnings that misusing the grant money was a felony. The two new facilities were established using a shared location. However, Beus misused his grant money for personal matters. Through the shared-location arrangement, Olson learned about some of the misuse. Olson later helped submit grant-use reports to the federal government that contained information about Beus’s usage that Olson knew was false. Olson later learned that Beus had committed additional, significant misuses of his grant money. Olson made notes and communicated with others about her belief that Beus’s conduct was inappropriate and illegal. However, Olson did not report the information to federal authorities. Olson was eventually charged with the federal crime of misprision of felony, i.e., failing to report a known felony, for not having reported Beus’s felonious activities. A jury convicted Olson of misprision of felony, and she appealed to the Ninth Circuit. On appeal, the parties disagreed about whether a person could commit misprision of felony if the person knew only about the wrongdoer’s bad conduct, or if the person also needed to know that the bad conduct was a felony.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fisher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.