United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
589 F.2d 799 (1979)
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted Patricia Lynn Opager (defendant) for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. At trial, government witness Phillip Posner testified he worked at a beauty salon with Opager in 1974 and again in 1976, and both times saw her sell cocaine. Opager called five witnesses to impeach Posner's character for truthfulness. Opager also proffered salon payroll records to show she and Posner did not work together in 1974. The judge ruled the payroll records inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b). The jury convicted Opager. On appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Opager argued the judge erred in excluding the payroll records.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.