Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

United States v. Oracle Corporation

331 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (2004)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

United States v. Oracle Corporation

United States District Court for the District of Northern California

331 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (2004)

Facts

Oracle Corporation (defendant) was the number one firm that developed and sold enterprise-resource-planning (ERP) system software, a type of enterprise-application software. The other major ERP developers were PeopleSoft, Inc., the number two firm in the market, and SAP, a German company, though many smaller companies produced ERP software. ERP software integrates a company’s data across the company’s activities. ERP programs that focus on a particular aspect of business are called pillars. The human-relations-management pillar (HRM) contains modules that automate payroll, benefits, time management, and other aspects of human relations. The financial-management-systems (FMS) pillar contains modules that automate ledgers, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other aspects of financial management. The government (plaintiff) classified software that could simultaneously be used by thousands of users as high function, and products meant for smaller organizations were classified as mid-market. Oracle sought to acquire PeopleSoft. The government sought to enjoin Oracle’s acquisition, arguing that the merger of Oracle and PeopleSoft would further restrict an already highly concentrated market of high-function HRM and FMS software in the United States, creating a duopoly of the merged companies and SAP America in violation of § 7 of the Clayton Act.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walker, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership