United States v. Orellana-Blanco
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
294 F.3d 1143 (2002)
The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Santos Orellana-Blanco (Orellana) (defendant), an alien, for entering into a sham marriage, and then lying to immigration officials about that marriage, in order to obtain permanent resident-alien status and the green card indicative of that status. At trial, Orellana testified that he had an intimate sexual and domestic relationship with Beatrice Boehm before their wedding, that Boehm would not let him live with her after the wedding, and that the marriage broke up solely for financial reasons. Boehm testified that she met Orellana on their wedding day, and that she and Boehm never lived together because the marriage was always a sham. The federal district court judge admitted government Exhibit 3, the report of an interview held in connection with Orellana's application for a green card. An immigration officer named Kendall conducted the interview. The report recorded that Orellana told Kendall that he and Boehm lived together as husband and wife. Orellana denied making that statement. Kendall was on sick leave during the trial and did not testify. An immigration officer named Radke testified instead. Radke attended the interview only briefly, to help Kendall translate Orellana's Spanish, which both Radke and Kendall had trouble understanding. Radke testified that the report was not a verbatim account of the interview, and that he could not decipher the spotty and cryptic notes from which Kendall later compiled the report. Despite their apparent reservations as to Boehm's credibility, the jury convicted Orellana. On appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Orellana challenged the admission of Exhibit 3.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kleinfeld, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.