United States v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Case No. 14-cr-00175-TEH, Not reported in F. Supp. 3d. (2015)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) (defendant) owned and operated gas lines. A PG&E gas line ruptured and caused a fire that killed and injured people and damaged homes. The grand jury investigating the matter was instructed that it could impute to PG&E the actions of all of its employees to find that PG&E had willfully violated the law. The grand jury returned an indictment charging PG&E with knowing and willful violations of the safety standards for pipeline transportation of natural gas under the Pipeline Safety Act, 49 U.S.C. § 60123. PG&E moved to dismiss the charges on the ground that the government had erroneously instructed the grand jury based on a collective-knowledge theory of intent.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Henderson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.