From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
United States v. Parker
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
373 F.3d 770 (2004)
After a vacancy occurred in the Ohio County, Kentucky, judicial district, Judge Renona Browning swore in Michelle Madison as the temporary trial commissioner for the county. Madison was Judge Browning’s brother’s widow. As the temporary trial commissioner, Madison was responsible for issuing warrants. Madison was also employed as a chief lieutenant deputy jailer at the Ohio County Detention Center. Madison’s responsibilities in that role were more administrative than a traditional jailer’s duties. Madison did not carry a weapon, wear a uniform, or typically participate in the monitoring of prisoners. Madison had been hired and was supervised by the jailer, who was a law enforcement official, and was employed by the law enforcement agency responsible for the jail, however. In these two roles, Madison was in the position to both issue arrest warrants and collect various jail fees from anyone arrested under those warrants. Madison eventually signed two search warrants to search a house. That search turned up 71 firearms, drugs, explosives, and stolen property that implicated the house’s residents, Barbara Jean Sutton and Peter Sutton, as well as David Parker (defendants). At trial, the district court concluded that the search warrants were invalid because Madison was not a neutral and detached party to the warrant-issuing process because she also worked at the detention center. As a result, the court suppressed the evidence seized under those warrants. The prosecution filed an interlocutory appeal to challenge the suppression of the evidence.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Duggan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 602,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 602,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.