United States Supreme Court
542 U.S. 630 (2004)
Samuel Francis Patane (defendant) was arrested and placed under a temporary restraining order for harassing his ex-girlfriend. Colorado Springs Police were investigating allegations that Patane violated the order by calling his ex-girlfriend, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) was investigating reports that Patane illegally possessed a gun. Patane was arrested, and an officer began to give the Miranda warnings. Patane claimed he knew his rights and cut the officer off. The officer then asked about the gun, and Patane reluctantly allowed the officer to seize it. Patane was indicted by a grand jury for illegally possessing the gun. Patane moved to suppress the gun on the basis that the gun was the fruit of Patane’s unwarned statements. The district court suppressed the gun, but did so on the grounds that there was no probable cause to arrest Patane. The appellate court reversed the finding that there was no probable cause, but upheld the suppression on the basis of Patane’s original argument. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Dissent (Souter, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.