United States v. Patrick
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 53 (1963)
- Written by Whitney Punzone, JD
Facts
In 1955 Talbot Patrick (plaintiff) was sued by his wife for divorce. Patrick and his wife entered into a property-settlement agreement to settle matters relating to the ownership of stocks in a publishing company, business real estate, two houses, and independently owned securities. The agreement stated it would settle matters growing out of the marital relationship. The South Carolina divorce court granted Patrick’s wife a divorce, approved the property-settlement agreement, and ordered Patrick to pay legal fees for both himself and his wife. For the tax year 1956, Patrick claimed a deduction for a portion of the legal fees relating to the rearranging of stock interests and business real estate. The commissioner of internal revenue (defendant) did not allow the deduction. The district court found the expenses to be deductible pursuant to § 212(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The court of appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.