United States v. Patrick

372 U.S. 53 (1963)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Patrick

United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 53 (1963)

Facts

In 1955 Talbot Patrick (plaintiff) was sued by his wife for divorce. Patrick and his wife entered into a property-settlement agreement to settle matters relating to the ownership of stocks in a publishing company, business real estate, two houses, and independently owned securities. The agreement stated it would settle matters growing out of the marital relationship. The South Carolina divorce court granted Patrick’s wife a divorce, approved the property-settlement agreement, and ordered Patrick to pay legal fees for both himself and his wife. For the tax year 1956, Patrick claimed a deduction for a portion of the legal fees relating to the rearranging of stock interests and business real estate. The commissioner of internal revenue (defendant) did not allow the deduction. The district court found the expenses to be deductible pursuant to § 212(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The court of appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Harlan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership