Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

United States v. Paul

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
175 F.3d 906 (11th Cir. 1999)


Facts

Sunonda Paul (defendant) was charged with extortion in connection with an attempt to rob a bank. The bank received an anonymous, handwritten note, directing it to leave $100,000 in a briefcase in a nearby McDonald’s bathroom. When the bank received the note, it alerted the FBI which stationed agents at the McDonald’s and witnessed Paul pick up the briefcase and attempt to leave. After Paul was arrested, Paul gave handwriting samples to the FBI. Larry Ziegler, an FBI document examiner, determined that Paul’s samples matched the note left at the bank. In his samples, Paul had misspelled “restaurant” and the bank manager’s name in the same way that they were misspelled on the note left at the bank. The district court denied Paul’s motion to exclude Ziegler’s testimony. Paul sought to counter Ziegler’s testimony by calling Mark Denbeaux, a law professor who taught evidence, to rebut Ziegler’s claims that the handwritings matched. The district court granted the prosecution’s motion to exclude this testimony. The jury convicted Paul. He appealed on the grounds that (1) Ziegler’s testimony did not assist the jury, (2) Ziegler’s testimony was more prejudicial than probative because the jury believed that Ziegler’s analysis was scientific when it was not, and (3) Denbeaux’s testimony should have been admitted as expert testimony.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Hatchett, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.