United States v. Paulin

329 F. App’x 232 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Paulin

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
329 F. App’x 232 (2009)

RW

Facts

Between 1999 and 2005, Maude Paulin (defendant) coerced a Haitian immigrant girl into performing arduous domestic chores under harsh and dehumanizing conditions. Paulin enforced the girl’s obedience through beatings and threats of sending the girl back to Haiti. After state authorities rescued the girl, the United States government pressed criminal charges against Paulin in federal district court. The three-count indictment charged Paulin with (1) conspiring to violate the Thirteenth Amendment, (2) violating the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000, and (3) violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324’s prohibition against harboring aliens for financial gain. The government took care to distinguish the elements of coercion in the first two counts and also carefully distinguished between Paulin’s pre- and post-2000 conduct. The jury found Paulin guilty on all three counts. Paulin appealed to the Eleventh Circuit, arguing that (1) the government conflated the different elements of coercion needed to support the Thirteenth Amendment and TVPA charges, (2) the government violated the Ex Post Facto Clause by introducing evidence that predated the TVPA’s enactment, and (3) the district court failed to instruct the jury to consider that Paulin’s motives were not purely financial but also charitable.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership