United States v. Paull
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
551 F.3d 516 (2009)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Jerry Paull (defendant) was a 65-year-old former minister who suffered from Type I diabetes, Meniere’s disease that caused vertigo, coronary artery disease, and osteoporosis. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents became aware of Paull’s online activity involving child pornography and executed a search warrant at his residence. Agents found a garbage can containing 3,700 images and numerous videotapes of child pornography. Paull confessed and entered a conditional plea of guilty to knowing possession of child pornography. The plea agreement stipulated to an offense level of 30, which included enhancements for images of a prepubescent minor, images portraying sadistic/masochistic conduct, use of a computer, and possession of over 600 images. The presentence report recommended additional enhancements for obstruction of justice and a pattern of activity involving the sexual abuse of a minor, resulting in an offense level of 37 and a guideline range of 210 to 262 months’ imprisonment. The court considered but rejected Paull’s arguments for a variance based on his age, poor health, rehabilitation efforts with a sex-addiction group, and history of sexual abuse as a child. The court also considered varying upward based on Paull’s lack of empathy for his child victims and the volume and nature of images Paull possessed. The court imposed a within-guidelines prison sentence of 210 months. On appeal, Paull argued that his sentence was substantively unreasonable because it was greater than necessary to serve the purposes of sentencing set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and the district court had over-emphasized the impact on victims and improperly discounted factors that weighed in favor of a downward variance from the calculated guidelines range.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boggs, C.J.)
Dissent (Merritt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.