United States v. Peoples
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
250 F.3d 630 (2001)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Xavier Lightfoot and Cornelius Peoples (defendants) were charged with robbing a federally insured credit union. Jovan Ross, Lightfoot’s roommate, cooperated with law enforcement in searching their shared residence to recover items stolen during the robbery. After Lightfoot and Peoples learned of Ross’s cooperation with law enforcement, Ross was found murdered. At trial, the government (plaintiff) sought to introduce the testimony of Agent Joan Neal to interpret phone conversations between Lightfoot and Peoples. During her testimony, Agent Neal stated multiple times that Lightfoot and Peoples were using coded language and slang to discuss hiring a hit man to kill Ross. Ultimately, Lightfoot and Peoples were convicted of the charges. On appeal, they argued that the trial court erred in admitting Agent Neal’s testimony as lay opinions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wollman, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.