United States v. Phibbs
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
999 F.2d 1053 (1993)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Phibbs and Whited, among others (defendants) were charged with various drug-related offenses. The prosecution (plaintiff) called Jerry Parks and Tommy McKeehan as witnesses. Parks had previously been found incompetent to stand trial and had been committed to mental-health facilities. McKeehan’s psychiatrist filed an affidavit with the court indicating that McKeehan suffered from confusion and hallucinations. The district court did not conduct a preliminary examination of the competency of these witnesses prior to their taking the stand. At one point during the trial, however, the judge did state that Parks and McKeehan “were not crazy witnesses.” The judge also stated that McKeehan appeared to be sober and cogent. The defendants were convicted. Whited appealed on the ground that Parks and McKeehan were not competent witnesses.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Guy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.