United States v. Phillips
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
376 F. Supp. 2d 6 (2005)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
A federal wire-fraud statute made it illegal to transmit a wire, radio, or television communication in interstate commerce that furthered a fraudulent scheme. Gerald Phillips and three others (defendants) were charged with violating the federal wire-fraud statute. At trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) did not present any evidence that the alleged wire communications ever crossed a state line. Phillips and the others were convicted of violating the wire-fraud statute. However, the men moved for a directed verdict, arguing that they could not be convicted under the federal wire-fraud statute without evidence that their wire communications had crossed a state line.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ponsor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.


