United States v. Pittsburgh Pacific Co.

30 I.B.L.A. 388, 84 I.D. 282 (1977)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Pittsburgh Pacific Co.

United States Interior Board of Land Appeals
30 I.B.L.A. 388, 84 I.D. 282 (1977)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

Pittsburgh Pacific Company (Pittsburgh) (defendant) applied for a mineral patent for 12 20-acre lode mining claims located within the Black Hills National Forest in South Dakota. Pittsburgh claimed to have discovered 160 million tons of low-grade iron ore and intended to mine 96 million tons under a plan of operations that was predicted to involve over one-half billion dollars in gross revenue. The Forest Service and the Department of Agriculture requested that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) (plaintiff) file a contest complaint against Pittsburgh’s patent application, arguing that there had been no discovery of valuable mineral deposits and the claims were invalid. The BLM filed the complaint, alleging that Pittsburgh had not proved its discovery of valuable deposits and that there were errors in the geological and economic analysis Pittsburgh performed. The BLM argued that Pittsburgh did not prove there was a sufficient water supply for the operations, that Pittsburgh did not prove that it could acquire the requisite acreage for the anticipated construction at a reasonable price, that Pittsburgh did not have adequate financing, that Pittsburgh had not properly estimated labor costs, and that Pittsburgh had not accurately calculated the expenses of complying with environmental-protection laws. The administrative-law judge (ALJ) dismissed the contest proceeding. The BLM appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Goss, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership