United States v. Ponds
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
454 F.3d 313 (2006)
In 1996, lawyer Navron Ponds (defendant) agreed to represent a drug dealer named Jerome Harris and received a Mercedes Benz through Harris’s mother as his retainer. Ponds and Harris did not mention the Mercedes when the government seized Harris’s assets after Harris’s conviction. However, Harris later told the Maryland United States Attorney’s Office, and that office launched an investigation into Ponds. The government searched Harris’s jail cell for the retainer agreement and subpoenaed several categories of documents from Ponds, including anything referencing use or ownership of the Mercedes, records of Harris’s legal-fee payments, documents that referred to Ponds’s sister, correspondence between the Law Offices of Navron Ponds and courts or prosecutors regarding Harris’s trial, and any records of employees of the Law Office of Navron Ponds since 1996. The district court granted the government’s request to give Ponds act-of-production immunity to provide the documents. Eventually, the District of Columbia United States Attorney’s Office launched its own investigation into Ponds’s failure to file tax returns in 1996 and 1997. After the government seized documents from Ponds’s house pursuant to a search warrant, Ponds was charged with tax evasion, fraud, and wire fraud. After a pretrial hearing, the district court held that Ponds’s production of documents under immunity in the Maryland investigation did not implicate Ponds’s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The jury convicted Ponds, and Ponds appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 687,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 687,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 43,000 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.