United States v. Powers

2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34007 (2010)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Powers

United States District Court for the District of Nebraska
2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34007 (2010)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Shaunna Briles gave the password to her America Online (AOL) email account to Chad Powers (defendant). Briles had previously emailed someone images of herself partially nude and in provocative poses. Powers used the password to access the past email messages in Briles’s account and, without Briles’s authorization, sent the images from Briles’s email account to individuals in Briles’s address book and to others. Briles contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation and advised a special agent that three of the email messages were sent from her AOL email account and that her sister had received one of the messages on her work account. The agent received copies of the email messages and attached images from Briles’s sister’s supervisor. Analysis showed that the IP address from which the email messages originated was registered to Cox Communications. In response to a subpoena, Cox Communications confirmed that the IP address belonged to Powers. Powers was charged with intentionally exceeding authorized access to a computer and thereby obtaining information from a protected computer in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2)(C). Powers moved to dismiss the CFAA count, arguing that Congress did not intend 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2)(C) to protect personal computers. At the evidentiary hearing on Powers’s motion, the manager of the computer systems of the federal public defenders’ office testified that email accounts store email messages and attachments on servers and that the images of Briles that Powers sent by email were located on the server and not on the hard drive of Powers’s personal computer.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thalken, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership