United States v. Price

558 F.3d 270 (2009)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 43,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Price

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

558 F.3d 270 (2009)

Facts

John Joseph Price, Jr. (defendant) sold methamphetamine to an undercover agent, Randall Schirra, and then eluded arrest for over two years until Schirra arrested Price at Price’s workplace. A search incident to Price’s arrest revealed plastic bags with methamphetamine residue and pH papers, which are often used in methamphetamine production. Schirra knew from informants that Price produced methamphetamine in his garage or basement. Schirra and another officer went to Price’s home, told Price’s common-law wife, Debbie Fischer, that Price was arrested, and requested Fischer’s consent to search for methamphetamine production to ensure that she and her children would be safe. Fischer verbally consented to a search of her house and property. In the bedroom Fischer and Price shared, police found two glass pipes and a baggie containing a chemical used in methamphetamine production. Fischer then asked police to stop searching the house. The parties later disputed whether Fischer consented to a search of the basement. Police picked the basement’s lock and saw several chemicals used in methamphetamine production. Police told Fischer that the house was dangerous and that she and her children needed to leave and seek medical treatment. At that point, Schirra asked Fischer to sign a written consent form, but Fischer refused. Schirra posted officers outside the house and obtained a search warrant. During the search, police seized many chemicals related to methamphetamine production from the basement. Price entered a conditional guilty plea to manufacture and possession of methamphetamine and then appealed the district court’s partial denial of his motion to suppress.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chagares, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 687,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 687,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 43,000 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 687,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 43,000 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership