United States v. Rahimi
United States Supreme Court
144 S.Ct. 1889 (2024)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
After Zackey Rahimi (defendant) publicly assaulted his girlfriend, she obtained a restraining order against him. The order included findings that Rahimi had committed family violence and posed a credible threat to the physical safety of the girlfriend and the couple’s young child. Among other things, the order suspended Rahimi’s gun license for two years. About 10 months later, police discovered a pistol, a rifle, and ammunition in Rahimi’s home. Rahimi was indicted for possessing a firearm while subject to a domestic-violence restraining order in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8). Rahimi moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that the statute was facially unconstitutional because it violated the Second Amendment. The district court denied the motion, but the Fifth Circuit reversed and found § 922(g)(8) unconstitutional based on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)
Concurrence (Jackson, J.)
Concurrence (Barrett, J.)
Concurrence (Kavanaugh, J.)
Concurrence (Gorsuch, J.)
Concurrence (Sotomayor, J.)
Dissent (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.