United States v. Raines

362 U.S. 17 (1960)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Raines

United States Supreme Court
362 U.S. 17 (1960)

Facts

The United States attorney general (plaintiff) sued James Raines and other voting officials for Terrell County, Georgia (collectively, the county officials) (defendants) in federal district court, alleging they had unlawfully discriminated against Black residents attempting to register to vote. The attorney general brought the action under a federal statute that allowed the attorney general to sue “any person” who discriminated against a voter or potential voter based on race. The district court ruled the statute was unconstitutional because the Fifteenth Amendment prohibited racial discrimination only by state actors, and the statute’s use of “any person” could be interpreted to permit lawsuits against private actors. The court held that this potentially unconstitutional application voided the statute in all situations. Accordingly, even though the attorney general’s complaint named only state actors as defendants, the district court dismissed the lawsuit. The attorney general appealed directly to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership