United States v. Ratcliff
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
488 F.3d 639 (2007)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Barney Dewey Ratcliff, Jr., (defendant) was the incumbent parish president for Livingston Parish, Louisiana, and was running for reelection. Under a campaign finance law, candidates for public office in Louisiana were restricted from accepting any contributions, loans, or loan guarantees in excess of $2,500 from any individual and were required to file campaign-finance-disclosure reports with the Louisiana Board of Ethics. Over the course of his campaign for reelection, Ratcliff secured a number of large loans with the help of some wealthy constituents, in violation of the campaign-finance law. Ratcliff misled the ethics board during its investigations into these shady financial deals. Ratcliff won the election and was later indicted for 14 counts of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341. The charges alleged that Ratcliff had secured his reelection through the illegal loans and that he had used the mail to defraud Livingston Parish of his elected-official salary and benefits through his misrepresentations to the ethics board. The district court granted Ratcliff’s motion to dismiss the charges on the basis that the alleged activities did not defraud anyone of money or property as required by the statute. The government appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (King, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.