United States v. Rayburn House Office Building, Room 2113, Washington, D.C. 20515
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
497 F.3d 654 (2007)
- Written by Arlyn Katen, JD
Facts
In 2006, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents executed a search warrant for Room 2113 of the Rayburn House Office Building (defendant), which was the office of Congressman William Jefferson. This was the first search warrant ever executed for a sitting Congressperson’s office. Jefferson promptly moved for the return of all seized property pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g), asserting that the search violated the Speech or Debate Clause of the United States Constitution (the clause), which states that members of Congress may not be questioned in any other place regarding any speech or debate made in Congress. The district court denied Jefferson’s motion, reasoning that the warrant adequately prevented violation of the clause by excluding materials regarding legitimate legislative activity. Jefferson appealed the denial, and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) remanded the record to the district court to determine which materials, if any, were legislative records. The D.C. Circuit’s remand order outlined a process for Jefferson to examine copies of the materials seized and submit a list of documents that he believed were privileged to the district court. The federal government (plaintiff) was prevented from reviewing the seized materials throughout Jefferson’s motion and appeal. While the appeal to the D.C. Circuit was pending, a grand jury returned an indictment charging Jefferson with racketeering, solicitation of bribes, money laundering, wire fraud, obstruction of justice, and related charges.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.