United States v. Reynolds
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
710 F.3d 498 (2013)
- Written by Jack Newell, JD
Facts
Reynolds (defendant) was convicted of sexually assaulting a minor and was required to register as a sex offender as a result. Later, Congress passed the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), which placed additional registration requirements on sex offenders. The Department of Justice (DOJ) promulgated a rule without notice-and-comment rulemaking that imposed the new requirements retroactively. The DOJ stated that it was skipping the notice-and-comment period to prevent any uncertainty about the rule and to stop sex crimes. Reynolds was arrested for failing to meet the new registration requirements. He was convicted and appealed the case to the Supreme Court, which remanded it to the Third Circuit to decide whether it was permissible for the DOJ to promulgate a rule without notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.