United States v. Rhynes
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
218 F.3d 310 (2000)
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted Michael Rhynes, D. S. Davis, and Corwin Alexander (co-defendants) for illegal drug dealing. Davis accepted the government's plea bargain and agreed to testify against Rhynes and Alexander. To ensure Alexander did not perjure his own testimony, the trial judge issued a Federal Rule of Evidence 615 sequestration order. The order prevented Alexander from hearing the details of Davis's testimony while Davis was on the witness stand. Davis's testimony revealed important details previously unknown to Rhyne's attorney, Scofield. Scofield briefed Alexander on Davis's revelations so Alexander could respond in his own testimony. After Alexander testified, Scofield told the judge about the briefing. The judge ruled Scofield violated the sequestration order and struck Alexander's testimony. The jury convicted Rhynes. Rhynes appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on the grounds it was reversible error for the judge to strike Alexander's testimony.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (King, J.)
Dissent (Wilkinson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.