United States v. Riesbeck
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
77 M.J. 154 (2018)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Boatswain’s Mate Second Class John C. Riesbeck (defendant) was charged with sexual assault and was tried by a court-martial made up of officers and enlisted members. Four officers were involved in the selection of Riesbeck’s court-martial panel. The final panel consisted of seven members, including five women, four of whom were victim advocates—individuals specially trained to help victims of sexual violence navigate the military justice system. The proportion of women on the panel far exceeded the proportions of women on the rosters from which members were chosen. At trial, Riesbeck moved to strike the female members of the panel, arguing that they had been improperly selected based on gender. The military judge denied the motion, and Riesbeck was convicted. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces vacated the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remanded the case for a DuBay hearing—an evidentiary hearing for resolving court-martial issues. The DuBay military judge found that: (1) at the time of Riesbeck’s court-martial, senior military leaders were under intense external pressure to punish sexual assaults, (2) the selecting officers did not make a coordinated effort to choose mostly women, and (3) three of the selecting officers likely consciously or unconsciously believed that it was important to have a large number of women on the panel. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Riesbeck’s conviction, and Riesbeck appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.