United States v. Riesbeck

77 M.J. 154 (2018)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Riesbeck

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
77 M.J. 154 (2018)

Facts

Boatswain’s Mate Second Class John C. Riesbeck (defendant) was charged with sexual assault and was tried by a court-martial made up of officers and enlisted members. Four officers were involved in the selection of Riesbeck’s court-martial panel. The final panel consisted of seven members, including five women, four of whom were victim advocates—individuals specially trained to help victims of sexual violence navigate the military justice system. The proportion of women on the panel far exceeded the proportions of women on the rosters from which members were chosen. At trial, Riesbeck moved to strike the female members of the panel, arguing that they had been improperly selected based on gender. The military judge denied the motion, and Riesbeck was convicted. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces vacated the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remanded the case for a DuBay hearing—an evidentiary hearing for resolving court-martial issues. The DuBay military judge found that: (1) at the time of Riesbeck’s court-martial, senior military leaders were under intense external pressure to punish sexual assaults, (2) the selecting officers did not make a coordinated effort to choose mostly women, and (3) three of the selecting officers likely consciously or unconsciously believed that it was important to have a large number of women on the panel. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Riesbeck’s conviction, and Riesbeck appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership