Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

United States v. Riggs

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
739 F. Supp. 414 (N.D. Ill. 1990)


Facts

Bell South Telephone Company (Bell South) provided telephone services to a nine-state region and handled emergency calls to emergency services using an enhanced 911 (E911) system. Craig Neidorf and Robert Riggs (defendants) planned to defraud Bell South by stealing a computer text file from Bell South that contained confidential and closely guarded information about the operation of the E911 system. Riggs and Neidorf wanted to obtain the file so that the file could be printed in Neidorf’s computer newsletter. Riggs used his home computer in Georgia to unlawfully access Bell South’s computer system, which was located in another city in Georgia. Riggs downloaded the text file and then transferred the file to Neidorf through an interstate computer network. Riggs stored the stolen file on a computer bulletin-board system located in Illinois so that Neidorf could access the file. Neidorf then used a computer in Missouri to access the bulletin board and receive the E911 text file from Riggs, after which Neidorf edited the file in order to hide the fact that the file was stolen. Neidorf published the file in the newsletter. Neidorf and Riggs were indicted on charges of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1343, which prohibits wire fraud, and 18 U.S.C. § 2314, which prohibits the transfer in interstate commerce of any goods, wares, or merchandise that are worth more than $5,000 and known by the transferor to be stolen. Neidorf moved to dismiss the charges, arguing that the computer text file was intangible and therefore could not be stolen property.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Bua, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.