United States v. Rineco Chemical Industries
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
2009 WL 801608 (2009)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Rineco Chemical Industries (Rineco) (defendant) operated a facility in Benton, Arkansas, which was the largest American single-site facility that engaged in hazardous-waste fuel blending. Rineco received more than 400 different types of solid and liquid hazardous wastes from many generators. Rineco applied for and obtained a permit to operate a hazardous waste management facility under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Rineco did not, however, have a permit to operate a thermal metal wash (TMW) recycling unit at Benton. The TMW was a patented process that related “generally to waste processing.” The TMW operated as follows: metals, including vapors, were placed in the TMW and thermally treated, destroyed, incinerated, or burned. The treatment process yielded a substantial percentage of oil and char that was blended into hazardous-waste-derived fuel (HWDF) and sent to boilers and industrial furnaces (BIFs) for burning and energy recovery. Rineco claimed that a permit was not required to operate the TMW under a recycling exemption, focusing on the fact that the metal placed in the TMW was recovered and not sent for burning by a BIF. The United States (plaintiff) sued Rineco for injunctive relief and civil penalties, arguing that a permit was required to operate the TMW.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.