United States v. Roberts
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
88 F.3d 872 (1996)
- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
Hollis Earl Roberts (defendant), chief of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, was charged with sexually abusing three women who worked for him. Nine additional women alleged that Roberts had sexually abused them when they were working for him. The government (plaintiff) sought to introduce evidence from the nine women to show that Roberts engaged in a common scheme to sexually abuse women who worked under his authority. But the government offered limited information concerning the nine women’s proposed testimony. While Roberts’s case was already pending, Federal Rule of Evidence 413 became effective. Rule 413 provided that, in a sexual-assault case, evidence of the defendant’s past acts of sexual assault could be admitted. The district court determined that Rule 413 was inapplicable to Roberts’s case. Further, the district court excluded evidence from the nine women under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). The district court found that the evidence would improperly show Roberts’s propensity to commit sexual assault. The government appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
