United States v. Rosen

445 F.Supp.2d 602 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Rosen

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
445 F.Supp.2d 602 (2006)

Facts

Steven Rosen and Keith Wiessman (defendants) were employees of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a pro-Israel lobbyist organization. While serving in these positions, Rosen and Wiessman developed relationships with government officials who had access to sensitive United States government information. Rosen and Wiessman proceeded to obtain information from these sources and deliberately transmitted the information to unauthorized persons, including members of the media and foreign-government officials. More specifically, over an extended period of time, Rosen and Wiessman acquired and transmitted information related to terrorist activities in Asia and U.S. strategies in the Middle East. As a result of this alleged conduct, the defendants were charged with violating §§ 793(e) and (g) of the Espionage Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 793-93, which make it a crime to transmit national-defense information (NDI) to unauthorized persons or conspire to do so, respectively. The defendants challenged the constitutionality of § 793, arguing that it violates their First Amendment right of free speech.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ellis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership