United States v. Ross
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
588 F. Supp. 2d 777 (2008)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Bryan Ross (defendant) was charged with fraud. After his arrest, a meeting occurred between Ross and federal agents investigating the fraud. According to the government (plaintiff), the meeting was to ascertain whether Ross had any information that would make beginning plea discussions fruitful. The U.S. attorney assigned to the case, Blondell Morey, authorized the meeting but was not present. Ross made inculpatory statements at the meeting. Ross filed a motion in limine to exclude those statements under Federal Rule of Evidence 410 (Rule 410) on the ground that they were part of plea discussions. The government contended that Rule 410 did not apply because Morey was not present at the meeting.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lawson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.