United States v. Ruckstuhl

2017 WL 6523344 (2017)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Ruckstuhl

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
2017 WL 6523344 (2017)

Facts

Allen Ruckstuhl (defendant) completed a prison sentence and began a term of supervised release. One day during his release, Ruckstuhl punched his girlfriend, Jasmine Jones. As Jones was running away, Ruckstuhl pointed a gun at her. While the gun was pointed at her, Jones called 911 and told the operator that Ruckstuhl had a gun. A police officer named Brenda Crispin responded to Jones’s 911 call. Immediately after the altercation, Jones told Crispin that Ruckstuhl punched her and pointed a gun at her. The government (plaintiff) contended that Ruckstuhl violated the terms of his supervised release by committing domestic violence. At the hearing before the district court, the government introduced Jones’s statements to the 911 operator and Crispin. Jones’s out-of-court statements were offered to prove the truth of what Jones said. The district court admitted the statements. Subsequently, the district court revoked Ruckstuhl’s supervised release and sent Ruckstuhl back to prison. Ruckstuhl appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership