United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
393 F.3d 669 (6th Cir. 2005)
Russell Saadey (defendant) was charged with filing false credit applications. The prosecution introduced Saadey’s tax forms into evidence. Saadey admitted that the tax forms contained his signature. The prosecution also sought to introduce the false credit applications, which allegedly also contained Saadey’s signature. The prosecution did not call a witness to authenticate the false credit applications as containing Saadey’s signature. Rather, the prosecution sought to allow the jury to compare the signatures on the false credit applications with the signatures on Saadey’s tax returns. The district court permitted this comparison over Saadey’s objection. Saadey was convicted. Saadey appealed, arguing that the false credit applications had not been properly authenticated as containing his signature.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Batchelder, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.