From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
United States v. Salamone
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
800 F.2d 1216 (1986)
Salamone (defendant) was tried and convicted by a jury on various firearms charges. During voir dire, the district court granted the prosecution’s request and excluded for cause one potential juror and five potential alternate jurors solely because of their affiliation with the National Rifle Association (NRA). During voir dire, the trial judge asked the potential jurors about their affiliation with certain pro-gun organizations. He then asked no further questions. On appeal, Salamone challenges the district court’s voir dire. He alleges that the trial judge did not have the authority to exclude a whole class of otherwise qualified potential jurors because of any presumed bias they may poses.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Higginbotham, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.