United States v. Salisbury
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
983 F.2d 1369 (1993)

- Written by Kelly Simon, JD
Facts
In 1990, Betty Salisbury (defendant) was a Republican party operative and committee chairperson in Pike County, Ohio. From April 1990 through the election in November 1990, Salisbury reportedly assisted Ohio voters in completing absentee ballots. The United States (plaintiff) charged Salisbury with multiple violations arising from her efforts to help voters. During the trial, witnesses reported that Salisbury frequently punched the absentee ballots of other voters, prevented voters from seeing the entire list of candidates while they were completing absentee ballots, and assisted a voter in completing absentee ballots on behalf of the voter and the voter’s sons, who all lived out of state. At the conclusion of the trial, Salisbury was acquitted of multiple charges, and a hung jury resulted in one charge being dismissed. Salisbury was convicted of one count of voting and assisting others in voting more than once in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1973i(e) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Salisbury was sentenced to 18 months of incarceration, a $1,000 fine, and two years of supervised release. Salisbury appealed the jury verdict, arguing that 42 U.S.C. § 1973i(e) was unconstitutional as applied to her case.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Celebrezze, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.